I was
meaning to watch Les Misérables for
quite some time but up until Monday events got in my way. Les Misérable
or ‘Les Mis’ as it is known to its fans
is a Hollywood adaption of the famous musical which itself was based on Victor
Hugo’s epic nineteenth century novel. While I had heard good things about the
movie I was initially apprehensive. This worry seemed to be confirmed in the
opening scene which show a huge CGI ship been dragged into dock by chained
prisoners. I felt that this set piece was overblown and the scene was further
marred by Russell Crowe’s poor vocal performance in the role of the prision
guard/ policeman Javert . Thus in the first scene I was simultaneously
overwhelmed (by the CGI trickery) and underwhelmed (by Russell Crowes
squawk). However after this rocky start
the film improves markedly. Starting in 1815 (the year of the Bourbon
Restoration) the film follows several different story threads which all
converge during the republican rebellion of June 1832.
The major plot thread focuses on Jean Valjean (played by Hugh Jackman) a man who spent nineteen years in prison
for stealing a loaf of bread to save his starving family. In the beginning of the movie he is released
on indefinite parole but his papers, which label him as a ‘dangerous man’, ensure
he is unable to gain employment or shelter. Eventually he is taken in by a
bishop, whose kindness Valjean repays by stealing his silverware. He is quickly
caught by the authorities who return him to the bishop however the cleric
confirms Valjean’s alibi that the he gave Valjean the silverware as a gift.
Once the authorities leave the bishop tells Valjean that he lied for him so
that he could sell the silverware and become an honest and godly man. Inspired
by this act of kindness Valjean tears his papers and vows to start his life anew. Eight years later Valjean , living under the
alias of Monsieur Madelleine, is a successful factory owner and a pillar of
society but the appearance of Javet on the scene threatens his new life and
Valjean is faced with a moral dilemma when an innocent man is mistaken for
himself and is facing life imprisonment for Valjean’s crimes. Simultaneously we
see the tragic fall of Fontanne who after being fired by one of Valjean’s
foremen when it is revealed that she is using her wages to support her illegitimate
daughter, Cosette, who is living with a family of unscrupulous innkeepers. Unable to make money Fontaine sells her hair, her teeth and
eventually her body in order to pay for her daughters care. Eventually her path
intertwines with that of Valjean who feels a responsibility for her fall and
vows to become Cosette’s guardian.
The opening scenes of the movie
depicts an unjust world in which the poor suffer at the hands of inhumane laws
and are ignored by the rich. This foreground helps put the June Rebellion in context
but this attempt at radical change is ineffective against the power of the army.
In the end it seems to be examples of Valjean and Javert which seems to
illuminate the path out of penury however both these examples are troublesome.
Javert escapes his poverty by becoming a policeman and by adopting a strict
moral code in which the law is unimpeachable, however while Javert’s
dutifulness has its own dignity it is also problematic because he upholds a
system which is fundamentally unjust. Valjean after meeting the bishop also
becomes a man with a rigorous sense of morality but his code seems to be guided
by a sense of natural justice rather than strict adherence to the law: he will
follow the law when it is just, but he will break it when it is not. This moral
system allows him to improve both spiritually and materially however his
ability to transcend his station is essentially due to his lucky encounter with
the bishop and thus goodness and honesty alone cannot guarantee one’s
advancement out of poverty. We see Valjean’s success but we also see the
counter example of Fantine who dies in poverty despite her inherent goodness.
Both Valjean and Javert are shown to be pious
men and I think they represent two different approaches to morality: Javert’s morality
is rigid and legalistic while Valjean seems to adhere more to the spirit of the
law than to the letter. While Valjean’s system is the superior one it also more difficult because unlike Javert's morality it is not based on black-and-white distinctions and therefore it is more difficult to discern what is morally right.
Despite its length (158 minutes)
the film proceeds at a quick place which adds a sense of exuberance to the
proceedings. The film is quite melodramatic especially the ending which is
highly sentimental but I don’t think the film ever falls into mawkishness. On
the whole despite speed bumps in the beginning Les Misérables a highly
entertaining and engaging piece of cinema.
No comments:
Post a Comment